President Obama’s Stance on Gay Marriage: Prompted by Political Donations?
By AJ Segneri | 05/18/2012 | Activism, Movements | 26 Comments
For the last few days I have been thinking about President Obama’s stance on gay marriage. As much as I want to stand up and cheer for him I really have to do it with reservations. As an LGBTQA activist I have to pose the question to the president: Why are you making such a statement at this juncture versus making one two years ago? Understandably the president is figuring out ways to handle our nation’s economic crisis, conflicts in the Middle East, and wanting to be re-elected as president. One has to beg another question. Is the president taking a stance on gay marriage simply because he is running an re-election campaign?
The Windy City Times, Chicago’s LGBT newspaper, reported that when Obama was running for Illinois state senate for the first time in 1996, as a New Party candidate, he was a supporter of gay marriage; however he did not win the 1996 election. Since then he never said anything more about gay marriage, but was a supporter of civil unions.
So does President Obama support gay marriage genuinely, or does his support for gay marriage come with a price tag?
The Center for Responsive Politics researched in late 2011 that the following contributions from proponents of same-sex marriage:
• Tim Gill, a former tech executive and LGBT activist, and his husband, Scott Miller, of Denver, Colo., who bundled at least $500,000
• Charles Myers, of Evercore Partners, who has bundled at least $500,000 • Eugene Sepulveda, of Austin, Texas, who bundled at least $500,000
• Andrew Tobias, a writer and treasurer of the DNC, who bundled at least $500,000
• Dana Perlman and Barry Karas, of Los Angeles, who bundled at least $500,000 • Wally Brewster and Bob Satawake, of Chicago, who bundled at least $100,000
• Terry Bean, of Portland, Ore., who bundled at least $200,000 • Kathy Levinson, former president and CEO of E-trade, who bundled at least $200,000
• Laura Ricketts, of Ecotravel LLC in Chicago, who bundled at least $100,000 • Jeff Soref, of New York, who bundled at least $100,000
• Fred Eychaner, of Chicago, who bundled at least $50,000 • Paul Horning, of Atlanta, who bundled at least $50,000
• Kevin Jennings, the former Department of Education official, who bundled at least $50,000
Looking forward, if President Obama was truly for gay marriage, then would it not make sense to have him make a strong suggestion on the international stage? Plenty of countries discriminate against either homosexuality or do not recognize same-sex unions or marriage, such as India, China, and various African countries.






Leave Your Comment →
26 Comments
Daniel Rhea
05.18.2012
Money goes where money is found.
Jeanine Roche
05.18.2012
of course he supports it.
Catherine Smith Cole
05.18.2012
He has always supported it in my opinion.Weather people like him or not he did have to weight it out politically.Since he has done more for lbgt I support him on this…
Keyra Edmonds Harrison
05.18.2012
His personal view of it makes no difference. & why does everyone keep saying it was political? He’s a politician…. Drrrrr
Ron Bogan
05.18.2012
After years of evolution he has adopted Dick Cheney’s position. I don’t think he cares either way….It has no bearing on his socialist agenda.
David Alan Grierson
05.18.2012
He’s Queer for any vote – a sell out to all Americans, not just the perverted ones.
Justin Staller
05.18.2012
I “love” the veiled implication at the end–”He has to prove it by saying something internationally.” Like American-opinions-from-on-high will change the social landscape of other countries for the BETTER…
Ron Bogan
05.18.2012
Although it was good for 15 million from hollyweird the next night.
Katie Mitchell
05.18.2012
I think it is great when anyone open
y supports it, but it not the president`s job to regulate marriage. This and the recent abortion thing are just election year tactics. Obama, just like Romney, is paid to say what his opinions are, they are formed by money and power… not actual thought.What a great distraction from the things that are much more dire right now… NDAA, a foreign policy that can be likened to that of Hitler`s, and a national debt that has been spiraling out of control for decades. Don`t fall for the distraction… that is what THEY want.
Katie Mitchell
05.18.2012
People should be outraged at the exploitation he is committing against LBGTs. Shameful.
Peter Susskind
05.18.2012
you ask questions here, but I could find no link to a survey or questionnaire to answer them. Oh well, here are my answers anyway:
motivated by politics/NO
genuinely support/YES
better late than never? DUH, YES, THIS TOO
Given the alternative, and even not given the alternative, Obama will be even better in his second term, especially if he gets just a little support from both sides in Congress, and can steer completely clear of the Supreme Court, where the majority will continue to undermine him and ignore the will of the people whenever they possibly can.
Ray Smith
05.18.2012
he’ll do or say anything to get votes…..
Kathy Jones
05.18.2012
Of course he flip flop on this issue over four times in less then 6 years.
Janelle D. Wheeler
05.18.2012
i can’t speak for the sincerity, but it is obviously politically fueled. he has been losing popularity, losing the young vote, losing the independent vote…
Stuart James
05.18.2012
he clearly supports gay marriage and has since the late nineties according to the survey he filled out while running for a public office.
Was it a politically motivated? Of Course!! people are getting sick of putting up with the centrist when we wanted change.
Richard Garza-Ray
05.18.2012
The question is after his supporting gay marriage, will he change his mind after November, probably.
Gable Bates
05.18.2012
He was against it before he supported it, but he didn’t do so until Biden openly supported it, prompting an answer. This doesn’t help him gain votes, and likely alienates a number of people who aren’t fans, as he needs to appeal to independents and conservatives to have any hope at all.
Stacey Droboty
05.18.2012
good question larry. Judge Judy was on a talk show this am and said same sex marriage, in fact, all laws pertaining to marriage should be at the federal level. I agree,
Scott Boyd
05.18.2012
He’s a desperate whore for votes!
Donald Lanham
05.18.2012
I think it is not an issue for the President to be involved in.
Jason Clyber
05.18.2012
Barry is a smart motherfucker,he needs all the votes he can get.
John Vasilakis
05.18.2012
Do we even need to ask this question? Of course it was politically motivated. A blind man can see that.
Sydney Wood Savage
05.19.2012
It is a way for him to try and drum up votes…..
Sabrina Hayes
05.19.2012
To deny his support for gay marriage was the politically motivated lie. Now he is telling the truth for political reasons.
Jim Chaney
05.19.2012
I am sure it is just a way to drum up votes!
Barry Dank
10.01.2012
What may be Obama’s “genuine” motives for supporting same sex marriage is really beside the point. What is on point is the fact that as President he took a public position in support of legal gay marriage. Trying to find the genuine reason is a form of motive mongering and a distraction that really serves no purpose. What now is germane is what legislation re gay issues he will support or oppose and what executive orders he may issue.