Favorability Disconnect Between Local & Federal Government
By Damon Eris | 05/07/2012 | Arizona, California, Electoral Reform, Nevada, Oregon, States, Utah | 10 Comments
Though the public’s confidence in the federal government has plummeted to record lows over the course of the last decade, the same cannot be said for state and local government, according to a new survey by the Pew Research Center.
In 2002, roughly two-thirds of all Americans held a favorable view of local, state and federal government. In the last ten years, however, public confidence in the federal government has plummeted over 50%, led in large part by the failures of Republican and Democratic party leadership in the Congress. The favorability of state and local government has also declined, but not nearly as precipitously. The survey, conducted last month, found that just 33% of those polled had a favorable view of the federal government, compared with 52% who had a favorable view of their state government and 61% who viewed their local government positively.
For Democrats and Republicans, the favorability of the federal government appears to have more to do with the partisan composition of that government, and more specifically, the partisan identification of the president, than anything else. In April of 2008, President Bush‘s last year in office, Pew found that just 37% had a favorable view of the federal government, including 53% of Republicans and 29% of Democrats.
This year, the numbers are essentially reversed: only 33% have a favorable view of the federal government, including 51% of Democrats and just 20% of Republicans. The predictability of these sorts of reversals in opinion among partisans of the major parties would be comical were it not so tragic.
Given this phenomenon, it is noteworthy that the opinion of Independents has remained relatively steady over the same period. In April 2008, only 33% of Independents had a favorable view of the federal government. As of last month, that number had fallen to 27%.
Disgust at the failings of Republican and Democratic party leadership at the national level does not yet appear to have translated into a similar contempt for party government at the state and local level. The 52% of those who had a favorable view of their state government included 62% of Republicans, 50% of Democrats and 49% of Independents. At the same time, however, it appears difficult to find a majority who hold a positive view when queried about specific characteristics of their state government.
A separate Pew survey from last month found that just 49% of those polled believe their state government is “mostly honest,” and the numbers fall off from there: 42% said they believe their state government addresses people’s needs, 38% said their state government is generally efficient, 36% stated that officials can work together to “get things done” and just 33% thought their state government is careful with the people’s money.
Local government fared best among the respondents to Pew’s poll, with an overall approval rating of 61%, including 66% of Democrats, 65% of Republicans and even 56% of Independents.
How can we account for the direct correlation between locality and favorability? Perhaps the simplest answer lies in the ratio of representatives to the represented. Today there are nearly 700,000 Americans for every member of the House of Representatives. Needless to say, the gulf between the people and their representatives is not nearly as large at the local and state level. Fortunately, this disconnect between the American people and the federal government has an obvious solution: is it not time to enlarge the House of Representatives?






Leave Your Comment →
10 Comments
Preston H Long
05.07.2012
I certainly do not agree with that living in Arizona.
Antoinette Miller
05.07.2012
Local Government is “closer to home”. I feel like I have more of a say in what goes on and it’s pretty easy to keep up with any new developements. The bigger and farther away “government” gets, the less I feel like my voice is heard.
Duane Dichiara
05.07.2012
Well I think the implication of the post is that the local govt is more beloved because its ‘less partisan’. Here’s the problem – in many states that’s just not the case. Local offices are also VERY VERY partisan.
Mike Morrato
05.07.2012
Local governments are less “in your life” and are prone to dealing with legitimate local issues. They have a narrow scope by definition and are significantly more accessible than say a Congressman/woman or Senator, even at a state level. Local governments have to deal with reality and can’t float a budget or live year after year on deficits.
Kathy Jones
05.07.2012
money-local have to be realistic, federal just print or borrow.
Manuel Ducret
05.07.2012
I personally don’t trust local or state government as both of them are full of it.
Chris A. Guzman
05.07.2012
Local governments know the needs of the community far more than some far removed government body.
Nima Faanunu
05.07.2012
…. hence the purpose of the Constitution to keep local power LOCAL.
Richard Boehme
05.07.2012
The bigger the govt the less in touch it is. Keep govt from controlling every expect of our lives.
Pat Kennedy
05.07.2012
Wow, I would have thought that small town politics sucks with rampant nepotism and favoritsm.