How would the presidential candidates deal with urban America?
By Christopher A. Guzman | 01/27/2012 | Economy, Education, Elections 2012, Health Care, Infrastructure, President | 4 Comments
inhabitat.com
The stances of all the presidential candidates on urban development could be a key issue in this next election, given that proposed policies can play a role in reviving the economy and empowering citizens. Obama’s administration distributed more than $2.6 billion in stimulus money to transportation projects via the Department of Transportation’s TIGER Grants. Also, through the Neighborhood Stabilization Program, states and cities received stimulus money to deal with the effects from the housing crisis.
With the “Strong Cities, Strong Communities Program,” understaffed city offices were filled in six cities. Most notably, a partnership was facilitated between the Department of Housing and Urban Development, the Department of Transportation, and the Environmental Protection Agency to spend development dollars more effectively.
President Obama’s challenge with voters will be to demonstrate that the stimulus funds have worked- even under the light of scrutiny and a high unemployment rate. Here’s how the GOP field stacks up, all on different fronts of urban America:
As Massachusetts’ Governor, Mitt Romney aggregated state housing, transportation, and environmental agency resources for “smart growth.” Similar to President Obama’s actions at the federal level, this facet of Romney’s domestic policy adds to the perceived similarity between him and President Obama. On a related note, President Obama credited Romney’s state healthcare law as the model for the current national law.
Rick Santorum supported HUD as a former Pennsylvania Senator. Back in 2005, he partnered with fellow Senator Arlen Specter to announce federal funding that provides supportive housing and programs for ending homelessness. More than $63 million in taxpayer money went to the programs and projects. Embracing the compassionate conservatism philosophy, his presidential spending policies are likely to be distributed to remedying social problems that he sees facing urban America.
Newt Gingrich received criticism for calling child labor laws “truly stupid”, also stating he’s prepared to do what works to get poor children working again. Seemingly failing to appeal to urban America on another related issue, Gingrich has labeled President Obama a “food stamp president” and promised to be the best paycheck president. Politi-fact later found the former Speaker’s claim to be oversimplified.
Ron Paul’s track record indicates that he wouldn’t have the federal government play a role in urban affairs. Being the staunchest proponent of the 10th amendment out of all the candidates in the race, Paul would allow the states to handle issues like marijuana legalization. He’s previously slammed the war on drugs as unfair to blacks. The federal government would keep out of issues like mass transit and other city projects, based on his voting record. Holding fast to his libertarian philosophy, he favors reducing the dependence of individuals on government welfare programs.
Buddy Roemer, the former congressman and Louisiana governor, believes that the U.S. has become a “welfare nation” and calls for major reform and consolidation in federally subsidized programs like food stamps and transportation programs as well.
Most of the GOP candidates thus far have, for the most part, steered clear of transportation during the election season.
Leave Your Comment →
4 Comments
Malcolm Kyle
01.27.2012
Much of the progress made by the civil rights movement during the 1960s has been effectively eroded. Drug prohibition and the selective enforcement of drug laws have become the successor system to Jim Crow. They selectively target people of color, removing them from civil society and then barring them from the right to vote.
Drug Prohibition is the primary factor in the destruction of African-American families and African-American communities.
A disproportionate percentage of African-Americans are being branded as felons. This effectively eliminates the chance of finding decent employment, and with it the possibility to successfully raise and support a family.
The following facts are indisputable:
* Our heavily militarized Police force is effectively laying siege to black neighborhoods. This is not happening with the same force and zeal in predominantly white neighborhoods.
* (2009) Afro-Americans do not use drugs at a perceivable higher rate (9.6%) than white Americans (8.8%) Source: http://recovery2day.org/Alcoholism-and-Drug-Addiction/drug-use-by-race-education-and-employment.html
* Afro-Americans are being stopped and searched at a far higher frequency than white Americans.
* Afro-Americans represent just 12.2 % of the population but are 37% of those arrested for drug offenses.
* Afro-Americans comprise 53% of drug convictions but are just 12.2% of the population.
* Afro-Americans comprise 67 percent of all people imprisoned for drug offenses but are just 12.2% of the population.
* One out of three young African American (ages 18 to 35) men are in prison or on some form of supervised release.
* There are more African American men in prison than in college. That’s a four times higher percentage of Black men in prison than South Africa at the height of apartheid.
In July 2011 The NAACP passed an “historic” resolution, calling for an end to drug prohibition. Very soon, many other civic organizations, the entire faith community and all persons of good conscience will join the many who are already demanding that this horrific assault on the African-American community be halted immediately. What about YOU?
Whatever the exact dynamics involved, these racial disparities are a direct result of drug-prohibition and are quite clearly unacceptable. This dangerous and costly moronothon has done nothing but result in generations of incarcerated and disenfranchised Afro Americans. Any citizen not doing their utmost to help reverse this perverse injustice may duly hang their head in shame.
“The arc of the moral universe is long but it bends toward justice”
- Martin Luther King Jr
“If you are neutral in situations of injustice, you have chosen the side of the oppressor.”
- Desmond Tutu
Trevor Polischuk
01.27.2012
See, this is good political coverage. It compares how each candidate stands on issues. It’s not the he said, she said BS on CNN. “This just in, NEWT WAS MEAN TO MITT!”
Jsusskind
01.27.2012
I’m really glad this article included Buddy Roemer and Barack Obama–people forget that the race isn’t just between Gingrich and Romney
jen
01.27.2012
Interesting to read about the stand from the different candidates.