New Green Party presidential candidate both a dream and a potential nightmare for liberal Democrats
By Alan Markow on 10/31/2011 in Elections 2012, Movements, President with 20 CommentsArticle should take about 4 - 7 minutes to read.
For liberal Democrats disappointed in Barack Obama’s presidency, the Green New Deal that is the heart of Dr. Jill Stein’s newly minted Green Party presidential campaign must feel like a dream come true. It’s all the things that they had hoped for from Obama but failed to get, despite Democratic control of the House and Senate in his first two years of office.
But for Democrats who remember Bush v. Gore v. Nader in 2000, the Stein candidacy could seem more like a nightmare. It could seriously undermine the re-election of a Democratic president facing 9 percent unemployment and a 40 percent approval rating, and who appears to share, at least rhetorically, some or most of the political views of the Green Party.
Stein, however, laughs off the comparisons.
“Just because Obama claims to be a liberal and to support Occupy Wall Street doesn’t mean he’s not pro Wall Street,” Stein told me in an interview this weekend. “Look at who he brought into his inner circle from the very beginning – Wall Street insiders like Tim Geithner, Larry Summers and William Daley.”
Stein calls for the re-enactment of the much-maligned (and feared)Glass-Steagall Act, which separated commercial and investment banking between 1933 and 1999, and the prosecution of what she calls “Wall Street crooks.“ She believes that Obama failed to take strong action at the incipience of his term, choosing instead to “protect criminals” (in her words), and noting that the President opposed taking legal action against mendacious banking executives who cost Americans billions of dollars.
She also likes to remind voters that Obama has left the liberty-restricting Patriot Act in place and has been quick to pursue new military adventures in the Middle East. But Stein’s campaign goes beyond civil liberties, banking, and the traditional environmental focus of the Green Party. The foundation of her movement is the Green New Deal, which includes the following:
1. An end to unemployment through the development of green infrastructure jobs
2. Single payer health insurance for all
3. Free pre-k through college education
4. Forgiveness of all student debt
5. A moratorium on home foreclosures
6. Immediate return home of the troops – including private security contractors – from Iraq and Afghanistan
Stein believes the Green New Deal is the right solution for today’s mix of financial and morale problems the country is facing, and she claims she can do all of this and balance the federal budget. As an example, she cites healthcare costs, which have spiraled out of control because of our focus on treating rather than preventing illness.
“Both Obamacare and Romneycare are disasters,” she told me (she is a resident and practicing physician in Massachusetts). “Most healthcare systems are wasteful because they are not comprehensive in nature. You can’t treat half of the body as these programs do.”
On her web page, she describes her healthcare plan as a “Medicare for all system” and claims that it merely catches the United States up with the rest of the world. She also defends the existing Social Security system as sustainable, and calls climate change “the greatest threat confronting our generation.”
In addition to reducing healthcare and military costs, Stein would propose paying for her Green New Deal with additional, tiered taxes on wealthy Americans, a tax on Wall Street transactions, and a tax on corporate off-shore operations that are currently protected tax havens.
“Obama’s jobs plan and his proposed taxes to pay for it are just a drop in the bucket,” Stein said. “It’s not fiscally sound. I’m a deficit hawk. Under my plan we could run circles around these so-called fiscal hawks by doing the right things.”
In the big picture, getting elected as a third party candidate is undoubtedly a major challenge, but governing without a major party apparatus behind her could be an even greater trial.
“I plan to use the bully pulpit,” she told me. “My election will signal an earthquake. Then I can build on the good will that got me there.”
Also, it normally takes big money to make a significant political impact. Stein’s answer, though, is to get money out of politics.
“I want to change the rules, to return to the days of an unfettered press that is not controlled by big money interests and provides free and equal access for political candidates. We’ll have to work an end game around the Supreme Court’s rulings on Citizens United and other findings because passing a Constitutional Amendment takes too long. But it can be done,” Stein said. “The people want change.”
The groundswell that has already set her candidacy in motion is the Occupy Movement, which Stein speaks of enthusiastically on her website. It is also supported by President Obama and most Democrats, but Stein strongly rejects the President’s position as meaningless rhetoric.
“He has had the chance to take action against Wall Street and has embraced its tenets instead. We must not surrender to those who are mouthpieces for big money industries.”
Before Stein can attempt to implement her Green New Deal, she faces the daunting task of winning the Presidency, which requires gaining ballot access in most or all of the 50 states, and defeating the powerful Republican and Democratic party machines arrayed against her. The odds are staggering, but this does seem to be a season for seismic change in American politics.
Stein, her husband and their two children reside in Lexington, Massachusetts, where she has previously been a gubernatorial candidate. She is originally from Chicago.

















Leave Your Comment →
20 Comments
Fresnobiz
11.19.2011
Wow. Great to see. Go Green party.
Abbey Arletto
11.20.2011
I’d like to see evidence of Obama supporting OWS, because I haven’t found or heard of any.
june roldan
11.20.2011
I can’t begin to tell you how much I want this woman as our next President of the United States.
june roldan
11.20.2011
I can’t begin to tell you how much I want this woman as our next President of the United States.
Soror Zoe
11.20.2011
She sounds wonderful. Too bad she isn’t really an option, and even if she were, she could not do the things she claims. If they were possible to do, Obama would have done them.
Catherine Weigel
11.20.2011
Read Paul Street and do some research on Black Agenda Report. You’ll learn that Obama never would have done any of these things, even if it were possible. Obama is, and has been since the beginning, a creation of Wall Street and the MIC. Obama does what is good for Obama, not the people.
OccupyUS
11.20.2011
As much as I would love to see most of these proposals come to fruition, I have to think that the tea party and the rest of the Republicans are thrilled to see this. Obama will be Nadered if the Greens attract even a small percentage of the vote, and conservatives will win the White House. It is simple math. I would rather see intense pressure put on both parties to get money out of politics by casting out as many incumbents as possible of both parties, and making anyone running for office make a pledge to pass significant reform of campaign finance, lobbying, and other types of influence peddling. A divided left is a nightmare.
CameronS
11.20.2011
The Democratic Party is far-right conservative, by any reasonable standard. Obama’s soaring rhetoric is meaningless, his ACTIONS in office have been the same policy as Bush. Endless wars of aggression for oil, mountaintop removal, bailouts for banks, PATRIOT Act. Obama even overthrew an elected progressive government in Honduras. Conservatives already have the White House. So there really is no “spoiler” threat. Unless you’re afraid the Greens will “spoil” the Peace and Freedom Party.
OccupyUS
11.20.2011
I just cannot see that losing the White House to one of those frightening ideologues we see in the Republican debates would not be a whole lot worse than keeping Obama. Now THAT is far-right. Imagine the difference if Gore had been elected instead of Bush. This is the difference we are talking about. The left has been moving right since Clinton. The pendulum is finally swinging to the left, and we on the left are the only ones who can stop it by dividing at this critical moment.
We need to move the Democrats significantly to the left, and we are getting the numbers to do that.
Steve Campkin
11.20.2011
Go Green Party USA!! Greens are achieving fantastic things over here in the UK. Let’s face it, we’re the only real opposition to the corrupt politics that’s been running the world for years! Time for some real change.
http://www.greennewdealgroup.org/
Gertfranzen
11.20.2011
The American Eagle has got two right wings. No wonder it doesn´t fly all that well.
Bobby Cooper
11.20.2011
This is possible. The two party system is broken and falsely frames our politics into a divisive right vs. left that neutralizes the power of the people. A Third Party candidate cannot only make her voice heard, but she can win. Democrats and Republicans are two heads of the same beast. Reject the two party system and Leap to a New Party in 2012. If not now, then when?
http://www.facebook.com/#!/events/274001559302656/
godistwaddle
11.20.2011
If the Republicrats are scared, they brought it on themselves. I fail to find a whole lot of difference between Obama and Bush Lite. Is Guantanamo still open? Do we still torture at “black sites”? Are we still droning innocents in several places? Does Wall Street still “own” the U.S. Senate? Do Dems spread their legs for lobbyists as willingly as Repubs?
Leonore Dvorkin
11.20.2011
A vote for her would be, in effect, a vote for the Republican nominee. That’s because no third-party candidate has a chance in this country. Please, Democrats, do not make the mistake of voting for her. Instead, vote for Obama/Biden (make your vote count!), and then work to make the Democratic party more liberal.
Soror Zoe
11.20.2011
Thanks for saying that, I completely agree.
Adam M Helfgott
11.22.2011
A vote for Obomba is a vote for the republicans. Same exact agenda. Obomba doesn’t deserve our vote, and doesn’t deserve to win. What’s more, he hasn’t EARNED our votes, the key point in winning our votes.
ME
11.23.2011
BLAH BLAH BLAH… HEARD IT BEFORE. NOT DOING IT. AS IF THERE WAS ANY DIFFERENCE BETWEEN REPULBICANS AND DEMS. BOUGHT AND SOLD BY CORP MONEY. DONE AND DONE.
Jette
11.20.2011
Vote your hopes and not your fears! Go Green!
Catherine Weigel
11.20.2011
Well, fear of some Republican nutbag will not cause me to vote for Obama, because I do have a conscience. Obama is the worst of the worst, frankly. His murder record for drone warfare alone was enough for me to never vote for this guy. I feel that a vote for a monster like this is like a stamp of approval for these actions. My vote is worth more than that. I am glad to see Stein’s candidacy and will support it. If enough people did this, even if the de facto Republican won, it would make a strong statement. We as voters need to stop being cowards. OWS is having a strong impact and it’s only two months old. The more they try to shut it down the stronger it grows. We have to start somewhere. Remember that Obama’s DOJ and DHS coordinated with Bloomberg and various other mayors in the recent violent OWS crackdowns. Obama gets away with what he does because people buy into the nice smile and the rhetoric — and that should terrify people more than any in-your-face-lunatic from the other side. There were many things that Bush couldn’t get away with on the domestic front that Obama is implementing, and many of which he initiated. Wake up people. What is going on between Obama, the corporate Democrats and Republicans is nothing but grand theater for the ignorant masses.
Warren
11.20.2011
Drone warfare murder? You got to be kidding. Personally the drone warfare has shielded ours troops from the enemy and provided a quick end to Libya. Smoke some more.
Stanflouride
11.21.2011
You mean the drones that kill civilians in large number for every primary target they take down to protect the troops that Obama swore to pull out of the illegal and immoral war in Afghanistan.
Or the ones that facilitated the overthrow of a leader who raised the standards of the Libyan people, giving them this:1. All newly wed people of Libya received about $50,000 from the Government to start their life together.2. A home is the basic right of every citizen of Libya and guaranteed.3. There were no electricity bills in Libya. Electricity is free.4. No interest loans for the people of Libya according to Law. 5. Gaddafi increased the literacy rate from 25% to 83%. All universities are free in Libya.6. Medical expenses were free in Libya.7. The price of gasoline was $0.14 Gal (3.5 ¢ Liter) in Libya. We all know Libya has large petroleum reserves but other nations with near equal reserves charge much more.8. When Libyan citizen bought a car, the Government used to subsidize 50% of the price of the car. 9. A loaf of bread used to cost only 15 cents in Libya.10. The GDP per capita of Libya is very high for Africa. Over $15,000. Purchasing power was very high compared to the GDP.11. The economy of Libya was improving rapidly. In 2010 it had 10% growth. It has no external debts. It also has reserves of over $150 billion dollars.12. Unemployment was paid until the person found a Job.13. A Libyan mother used to get $5000 for giving birth a child.I know that Gaddafi supported terrorists (just like the CIA) and committed many crimes for which he should have been tried in the Hague but waving the flag for overthrowing a government so that oil companies can get their fingers in the pie is nothing to be proud of.
Brian Maday
11.20.2011
Still no talk about REALLY doing something MEANINGFUL about the 15TRIL deficit – but if will help knock obummer down a few pegs – it’s OK by me.
Robert Alberti
11.20.2011
This isn’t a race between Greens, Republicans, and Democrats, it’s a race between the American people and a two-headed Beltway giant. Democrats winning isn’t a win for the American people. Republicans winning is only marginally worse.
The bus is heading off the cliff. Republicans want to accelerate. Democrats want to keep going the same speed. Nobody is asking why we’re all on this stupid bus in the first place.
Tom Ellis
11.21.2011
Sounds too good to be true. Of course it’s an enormous threat to Obama’s reelection, but I ‘m just pissed enough to want to see her in office.
A_Miller
11.23.2011
If more people would stop worrying about hurting Obama’s chances for re-election and would vote Green Party there would not be a “Republican as president” threat. Don’t just TALK about how great it would be to have her as president…VOTE for her!
I do not believe Obama will do any better a second time around than he did this time.
Rboberg
11.24.2011
I like her and what she proposes., Realistically, like Nader in 2000, she may split the Democratic vote just enough to insure a Republican victory. The end result would be disastrous with the reasonable chance of a Republican controlled House and Senate and Mitt Romney in the White House. If that scenario should chance, changes will be quick and extreme. Romney is already spouting the term “Executive Orders” and protesting on Wall Street or anywhere else will become a life threatening decision–Remember fascists behave this way when they are in complete control. I do not believe now is her time.
HOWARD SWITZER
11.25.2011
Support Jill against the mighty two-headed liar.
Toni Gandel
11.27.2011
I support Jill Stein for President and will post her platform as often as possible to facebook. I look forward to campaigning for her and hope she will prove to American’s that we can have a 3rd party candidate win the Presidency!
Phuntsok
11.27.2011
For an article in the “Independent Voter Network” this is surprisingly pessimistic on the prospect for what independent voters and America in general needs most: An alternative to the useless political duopoly that weights us down. It nevver ceases to amaze me how often folks outside the beltway soot themselves on their feet. Will we ever learn that you can’t claim to be outside the box and think inside the box.